[QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"][QUOTE="KC_Hokie"]Sounds lazy to me and about 3 people are working on the console port. KC_Hokie
How about you wait and see how much effort went in the console version? If it looks and sounds better than most console shooters and keeps a solid framerate, then you know that a ****load of effort went in optimizing the console version.I'll believe it when I see it. Based on the comments from DICE they aren't putting too much into the console versions. Apparently a better PC version means the console version will be crap?
Thats stupid, DICE is doing whatever they can with the hardware at their disposal, its not their fault that consoles are outdated. Also many console games are 24 players anyways and look far worse compared to BF3, to you its a port if the PC has 64 players then the consoles should have it too! while despite ignoring the obvious difference in hardware. PC gamers are paying premium on their hardware to run with 64 players and I wager not all pc gamers will be able to play BF3 on 64 player servers either.
If there was a thread where some hermit with obsolete hardware was crying that DICE sucks because he cannot play Bf3 on a 64 player server @ high settings because he has a e6600 and 7800gt, everyone would just laugh at him and call him out.
While if some consolite complains about the same thing, its legitimate whining and they have the right to say it because they own a console?
Log in to comment