[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="gaming25"] Combined is probably what he meant.TheKing012

really? i heard it sold something like 4 million combined on consoles, and around 600,000 on PC?

must be mistaken.

definately mistaken

[QUOTE="Harisemo"]

[QUOTE="NanoMan88"]

Well it depends on the map and settings, if its strike at karkland IO then yes most def nade spam. I love how you sidestepped around the point though of more players =nade spam, next time back up ur trolling with evidence.

bleehum

evidence? you just admitted yourself BF2 is nade spam

You credited it being a nadefest to the high player count, when he clearly disproved it staying the only reason is the ridiculous amount of grenades people start with. You're obviously not addressing his point, and continue to just say, "lol nadefest."

He's just mad he has to play an inferior version with less players, worse gfx, smaller maps etc, these kind of people will say anything but at the end of the day their only fooling themselves.

Both Crysis and UC2 were both mediocre games that extremely inflated reviews because of their GFX. UC2 is worse in this case because cows parade it like the best game ever, its characters were boring and bland and the script was horrible. Enemies were braindead and the devs tried to make the game challenging by swarming you with them and making them take 1000 bullets to kill. The story was meh as well. The platforming was terrible as well and it makes me wonder why people would want this kind of platforming thrown into games, its not even rewarding or moderately fun.

[QUOTE="NanoMan88"]

You have no clue what you are talking about and just a persistent troll, Bf2 and 2142 was awesome with 64 players, bf2 was only a nade spam cause what each player started with like 7 nades, it had nothing to do with the amount of players. LOL custom servers suck? hahah. Keep crying or buy a pc. Sounds like some consolite is just butt hurt that they have smaller maps and less players, then you guys go back to arguing which whether the ps3 or 360 has better multiplatform games when the differences are marginal.

Harisemo

so u admit BF2 is a nadefest? i dont think nade spam is "awesome" but maybe hermits do like nade spamming so what can i say? well have fun nade spamming while I enjoy the crap non-nadefest version :)

Well it depends on the map and settings, if its strike at karkland IO then yes most def nade spam. I love how you sidestepped around the point though of more players =nade spam, next time back up ur trolling with evidence.

I can think of several games thats sp is better

Yeah it was somewhat consolized, DICE said it themselves that it was built with the consoles in mind. However compared to the rest of the MP shooters this gen its definately the best.

[QUOTE="tenaka2"]

[QUOTE="Sandvichman"] Yep, because i see no reason to buy the ''real version''

Harisemo

Aside from better graphics and player count, custom servers, less lag and more accurate controls?

more players = mess, slightly better graphics dont make the game more fun, custom servers mostly suck and console controls are fine. as for lag, how will pc version have less lag?

You have no clue what you are talking about and just a persistent troll, Bf2 and 2142 was awesome with 64 players, bf2 was only a nade spam cause what each player started with like 7 nades, it had nothing to do with the amount of players. LOL custom servers suck? hahah. Keep crying or buy a pc. Sounds like some consolite is just butt hurt that they have smaller maps and less players, then you guys go back to arguing which whether the ps3 or 360 has better multiplatform games when the differences are marginal.

Its funny how none of those games needs the wiis gimmicky control scheme and often play better without it. Just further proof that nintendo could have spent time making a better console instead of these motion controls.

[QUOTE="DreamCryotank"]

[QUOTE="TheKing012"]

why is the bottom Stalker gif the only one i ever see posted?

stop posting this game. it's an embarassment. low resolution textures everywhere...and that's not to mention the wooden animations (it's even worse than Fallout 3 and New Vegas).

edit: HD, full settings video of Stalker: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7u2_yVg7nxE

TheKing012

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syFA8aoqYoA#t=2m30s ;)

why are you including mods? that's essentially like me photoshopping Killzone 2 to appear as if it has the best HDR lighting available.

i'd prefer you go from the original source.

Mods seem like fair game to me, its not our fault consoles dont have any :D

Battlefield games still involve more skill and teamwork than COD or Halo though, in comparison to CS it involves more teamwork. Your supposed to play BF like a team game, a team of skilled players who doesnt use teamwork will lose to a team that uses teamwork which is good, we dont want a cod where ppl can go lonewolf. Also even the vehicles involve more skill that halo's vehicles. People complain about some chopper or jet pilot that decimates them, but they would never be able to do the same thing.