Raiko101's forum posts
If you played your PS2 on a screen as small as a handheld's, it would look better. The pixelation would be less obvious and the differing levels of detail would become less obvious. It would be like playing the game on the PS2, but squinting your eyes ever so slightly. The only real differences between those images shown is that the PS2 version has blurred backgrounds, wheras the 3DS version doesn't, as its trying to create a sense of depth.
Saying that, the texture's on Snake have improved, but I wonder if that was for the sake of the tech demo, rather than the final product, as the tech demo followed Snake a lot more closely than the actual game does.
[QUOTE="Raiko101"]I think the visuals for World at War and Reflex were quite poor by Wii standards. Blurry and pale. I'd rather the visuals played into the Wii's strengths myself.uberpunage101
Gamecube-era Graphics are quite good by the Wii's standard, even though the framerate drops considerably when it has to render 3D graphics. So I'm assuming that World at War and Reflex had 64-era graphics, right?
I've seen far better looking Gamecube/Wii/PS2 games.[QUOTE="Raiko101"]I think the visuals for World at War and Reflex were quite poor by Wii standards. Blurry and pale. I'd rather the visuals played into the Wii's strengths myself.Noskillkill
honestly i think WaW was bad overall but a lot due to terrible frame rate and choppy animation, but Reflex wasnt that bad, and had its good spots from time to time
Some of the levels in Reflex look alright, but the Wii can't really do justice to those helicopter levels. I'd still prefer something that looked less pixelated and more colouful.I disagree. The Wii has loads of great games. Some game's scores may be lower, but I feel that has more to do with the fact that Wii games tend to differ from those available on the other consoles. With the other 2 consoles, you end up with many similar themed games with equally similar gameplay and they become a safer option for gamers. For sure, the online support is far better than the Wii's, and online shoot'em ups will, seemingly, always reign supreme, but there are many highly-rated 360/PS3 games that I feel are not as good as some of the lower rated Wii games. I think this in an opinion many others would share, if they were not simply writing off the Wii without trying out the games properly.
The Wii has a massive collection of great games, which even if sequels to older generation games, all differ from each other. With the 360/PS3 its a huge collection of similar FPS games, 3rd person action/adventure games and racing games. Oh and a load of 'physics-based' platformers that aren't anywhere near as original as they make out they are.
Log in to comment