Its a better game than a 6 out of 10, no question BUT as a AAA game based on a highly successful IP it really is a pathetic effort. So the paying consumers are now expected to be QA testers?
No way known this is a 6 out of 10. After the first couple of hours I'd give it a 7, 20 hours later which is where I am at now, I'd give it a good 8 to 8.5
@Newhopes: Nope, sorry. If you've only played the first few hours then yes. The game gets a lot better the more you play it. It needed polish no question but its not a 6 out of 10.
To be honest, after three play throughs you really should have got all the trophies anyway. I enjoy getting them as its a box to tick but I'd never pay money to get them nor would I exploit or cheat in a game just to get them as it defeats the actual purpose of what they're all about. 'Achievements' should be earned not purchased.
It's a shame Nintendo haven't released some of their games, specifically the Zelda games across all platforms because even though I would love to play them I am just not interested in the console in order to play them, Switch, Wii U or whatever. No trophy or achievement support, garbage controllers in comparison to Microsoft or Sony, etc. Pity but congrats to those that have bought or will buy a Switch.
@FBohler: Yet it is still to this day the best single player open world engine around. Obviously the Creation Engine has been refined from Morrowind, Oblivion, Fallout 3, Skyrim and now Fallout 4 but its still hands down the best engine.
Salt_AU's comments