Timbury's forum posts

Avatar image for Timbury
Timbury

552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Timbury
Member since 2005 • 552 Posts
[QUOTE="Kashiwaba"]

[QUOTE="Timbury"]

[QUOTE="Kashiwaba"]

No you are completely wrong too its isnt that this game was more suited to 360 hardware its just that PS3 port was rushed.

No. . .im not! Did you read the article either? taking directly from the article to prove my point -

"The crux of the matter is that the PlatinumGames team has created a game engine that targets all the things that the Xbox 360 architecture does well, to the point where it's almost as if the core development was on similar lines to a first-party exclusive. Indeed, Bayonetta is technically more ambitious than many of Microsoft's own titles this year."

"As it is, the layering of transparencies, the sheer amount of them all over the screen, plus the added overhead of post-processing - it's the sort of thing that you shouldn't really be making central to the game experience in a multi-platform release, because the PS3 hardware just doesn't compete in this regard."

"For Xbox 360 owners perhaps feeling a bit bereft of state-of-the-art first-party gaming love this year, Bayonetta is like manna from heaven, and is well worth the plaudits. Its core technological and design philosophy favours Xbox 360 to such a degree that it puts a fair few first-party releases to shame. In places, it's absolutely epic. Go get it."

Well you just confirmed what I said its becuase they rushed doing PS3 port if they took their time and modified everything to make it suit PS3 architecture it would be nearly the same its SEGA fault they should have delayed PS3 version release date.

Yes you are right thats what i stated in the post where you said ' i was so wrong' i was trying to get that point across with my Uncharted 2 comment that if bayonetta had been stripped back barebones then rebuilt with how the PS3 works the game would run and look just as good. Im not denying that fact i have said it already in this very thread that it was a shoddy port.
Avatar image for Timbury
Timbury

552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Timbury
Member since 2005 • 552 Posts
[QUOTE="Kashiwaba"]

[QUOTE="yoshi_64"][QUOTE="Kashiwaba"]

Ah god people should stop complaining about this minor difference once you are playing the game you wont notice anything except that PS3 version colors are a little bit washed out thats all unlease you are playing with 300X zoom then you wont notice anything really PS3 fanboys loves nagging I dont remember seeing 360 fanboys nagging that much when dragon age 360 version was worse than PS3 version.

How can you not notice the obvious things like graphical effects, particles, and even texture being completely obliterated on the PS3 version? I've yet to go into the frame rate which looks terrible on the PS3 by comparison to the 360. I'll be picking this game up for the 360 instead it seems. I was disappointed to see it looks so bad by comparison.

I didnt say they are the same I said there is a difference but if you are not doing 300X or and comparing both of them at the same time it wont be a big deal + I said if you own both consoles then get 360 version but if you got PS3 only you shoukdnt let this difference prevent you from getting this great game after all this difference doasnt affect the great gameplay.

I don't understand how it cannot effect the gameplay from the framerate analysis video in the article the PS3 was all over the place. I would really like to know are you telling the truth on this matter?
Avatar image for Timbury
Timbury

552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Timbury
Member since 2005 • 552 Posts

[QUOTE="Timbury"]

[QUOTE="ZoomZoom2490"]

gow3 will look ten times better than Bayonetta, so much for 360 being more powerfull.

i wonder how big of fanboys the little kids are over that site when they said 360 is more powerfull than ps3 because of this game, lmao, it soo funny.

Kashiwaba

You really need to re-read the article as you obviously haven't grasped what they said. . . at no point in the article did they say the X360 is more powerful then the PS3 where did you get that from?!?

They stated that the effects that are in use are better suited to the X360 hardware and that the PS3 GPU isn't capable of keeping the same framerate in the games current state. Which meansif Uncharted 2 was ported straight across to the X360 it would probably be the same state of affairs ie performance issues the game was built with the X360 in mind not your PS3.

So take a deep breath and calm down fanboy urgh.

No you are completely wrong too its isnt that this game was more suited to 360 hardware its just that PS3 port was rushed.

No. . .im not! Did you read the article either? taking directly from the article to prove my point -

"The crux of the matter is that the PlatinumGames team has created a game engine that targets all the things that the Xbox 360 architecture does well, to the point where it's almost as if the core development was on similar lines to a first-party exclusive. Indeed, Bayonetta is technically more ambitious than many of Microsoft's own titles this year."

"As it is, the layering of transparencies, the sheer amount of them all over the screen, plus the added overhead of post-processing - it's the sort of thing that you shouldn't really be making central to the game experience in a multi-platform release, because the PS3 hardware just doesn't compete in this regard."

"For Xbox 360 owners perhaps feeling a bit bereft of state-of-the-art first-party gaming love this year, Bayonetta is like manna from heaven, and is well worth the plaudits. Its core technological and design philosophy favours Xbox 360 to such a degree that it puts a fair few first-party releases to shame. In places, it's absolutely epic. Go get it."

Avatar image for Timbury
Timbury

552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Timbury
Member since 2005 • 552 Posts
I don't think Wii Fit plus is selling anywhere near as much as Wii Fit HarlockJC
And i couldn't be anymore happy hearing that!
Avatar image for Timbury
Timbury

552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Timbury
Member since 2005 • 552 Posts
[QUOTE="Trmpt"]

[QUOTE="Panosola"]

Did you have see any game on the XBOX like this.......:?

gdfgddd

.............i have play many games on the XBOX but i never have see any game like that on the XBOX.That is very sad for the Wii.

What if someone has fun playing that?

Don't think he was talking about the fun aspect of the game which is many. . . this was a graphical debate as usual in System Wars.
Avatar image for Timbury
Timbury

552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Timbury
Member since 2005 • 552 Posts
what a win for xbox 360. the game looks so washout on ps3.Leo-Magic
Just shoddy, badly done port built with the X360 as its main system with the Ps3 code shifted off to another team.
Avatar image for Timbury
Timbury

552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Timbury
Member since 2005 • 552 Posts

gow3 will look ten times better than Bayonetta, so much for 360 being more powerfull.

i wonder how big of fanboys the little kids are over that site when they said 360 is more powerfull than ps3 because of this game, lmao, it soo funny.

ZoomZoom2490

You really need to re-read the article as you obviously haven't grasped what they said. . . at no point in the article did they say the X360 is more powerful then the PS3 where did you get that from?!?

They stated that the effects that are in use are better suited to the X360 hardware and that the PS3 GPU isn't capable of keeping the same framerate in the games current state. Which meansif Uncharted 2 was ported straight across to the X360 it would probably be the same state of affairs ie performance issues the game was built with the X360 in mind not your PS3.

So take a deep breath and calm down fanboy urgh.

Avatar image for Timbury
Timbury

552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Timbury
Member since 2005 • 552 Posts
The difference is only graphic-wise, if I understand correctly. For a game like this, so heavily focused on gampleplay, this shouldn't be a huge deal. I suppose most multi-console owners would get the 360 version, but I don't think any PS3-only gamer would stop getting this game because of it not looking as nice as good as the 360 version. So, there again, it's not a big deal.IronBass
Afraid not there is also alot of slowdown on the PS3 version alot of the time running half the frames of the Xbox360 build click into the article and watch the framerate analysis its quite shocking.
Avatar image for Timbury
Timbury

552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Timbury
Member since 2005 • 552 Posts

[QUOTE="Timbury"][QUOTE="RedruM_I"] ThisRedruM_I
Im sorry but if this game was just as good or better on the PS3 you would be all over it. Obviously it isn't the best port and PlatinumGames have already been onto Sega to try and patch the PS3 version up. I think things like this shouldn't be happening still with multi platform releases but it obviously shows there are still developers out there struggling with PS3 tech other then Sony's own first party studios.

Well duh, I only have a PS3. I won't be giving money for a game that they rushed on the console. I want them to take the time and give me quality. I wouldn't mind waiting a year more if the port is of good quality but since they decided to do a mediocre job then I won't pay for it.

What i was trying to get at was if this situation was reversed that the PS3 version was superior what would you be saying then? This isn't just directed at yourself but all PS3 owners and the respective fanboys?

Avatar image for Timbury
Timbury

552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Timbury
Member since 2005 • 552 Posts

[QUOTE="VendettaRed07"]And doesn't looks nearly as good. Look how blurry and dark everything looks you can barely even see whats going on.

loco145

It might be onrials. But those Doom 3 shots are bullshots.

You can't call bullshots then post your own?!? I just watched the Gametrailers review on Darkside chronicles in HD it looked nowhere near as good as those pictures. . . where's the jaggies?! This is the Wii we are talking about.