Villimax's comments

Avatar image for Villimax
Villimax

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 58

User Lists: 0

@89318101 @NightStein lol? Yeah, hilarious. Except that what I said is undeniably true, popular games with a lot of commercialism that will pay off reviewers always get really good ratings. CAPCOM doesn't do that.

Avatar image for Villimax
Villimax

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 58

User Lists: 0

Edited By Villimax

@hiverious @89318101 This is the polar opposite of a gushing, loving review. Instead of bias making a bad game seem good, it's bias making a good game seem bad. Any game that gives RE6 a high score is no less dishonest than one that gives it a low score.

Avatar image for Villimax
Villimax

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 58

User Lists: 0

@fog90 @DriedMoss You know he gets paid to make reviews like this, too? That's what really gets me.

Avatar image for Villimax
Villimax

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 58

User Lists: 0

@89318101 Wow! Well-said. I didn't even think about that as the reason the reviewer gave it such a low score.

Avatar image for Villimax
Villimax

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 58

User Lists: 0

@89318101 @NightStein Um, I know, that's why I said "Metacritic has Halo Reach at 91" as in 91 is the number they're displaying because that is all of the paid critics combined. Speaking of paid critics, a game like Halo Reach gets a 91 because it lubricates the pockets of popular review sites like Gamespot. When a Gamespot reviewer gave Kane and Lynch the low score it deserved, he got fired for dissatisfying Gamespot's sponsors, the people who made Kane and Lynch. Resident Evil 6 isn't paying Gamespot for a good review, so overpaid clowns like this World of Warcraft fan can review it and hate on it because of "too many QTEs" which isn't even true.

Avatar image for Villimax
Villimax

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 58

User Lists: 0

@DriedMoss @Villimax @ZRavN I would not even rate Resident Evil at all on its plot, whether it was good or not. It has great gameplay and a good atmosphere. There was a time when video games very rarely had plot exposition of any kind, now people like this reviewer think that if they don't like a plot of an action game (not an adventure game!), then nobody should play it.

Avatar image for Villimax
Villimax

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 58

User Lists: 0

@fog90 I don't think Leon's campaign is much scarier than the others. The campaigns sure are long, though! Most games nowadays just run 7 hours and call it quits because they include a terrible multiplayer mode.

Avatar image for Villimax
Villimax

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 58

User Lists: 0

Edited By Villimax

@fog90 Well it regenerates, that is pretty much the only similarity. It dies but then it just comes back to life until you escape the area it's in.

Avatar image for Villimax
Villimax

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 58

User Lists: 0

Edited By Villimax

@fog90 I think Amnesia is annoying because you try to get immersed in it and then get stuck on some puzzle. Maybe Silent Hill games aren't that scary, Fatal Frame sure is though.

Avatar image for Villimax
Villimax

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 58

User Lists: 0

@NightStein Metacritic has Halo Reach at 91 in spite of Halo Reach being unbelievably bad and a big insult to what made the Halo series great, so I wouldn't take Metacritic too seriously.