Wickerman777's forum posts

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts
@Gue1 said:

still wrong TC. PS4's bigger GPU will prove to be advantageous in the future. I don't think you know more than an architect with years of experience in hardware and software.

"Mark Cerny: That comes from a leak and is not any form of formal evangelisation. The point is the hardware is intentionally not 100 per cent round. It has a little bit more ALU in it than it would if you were thinking strictly about graphics. As a result of that you have an opportunity, you could say an incentivisation, to use that ALU for GPGPU."

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-face-to-face-with-mark-cerny

I've been trying to explain this to him but he doesn't get it. GPGPU has been ignored so far but that won't be the case in the coming years, not with PS4 exclusive titles anyway. I say exclusive titles because I suspect that X1's weakness in this area, not just with the amount of ACE units it has but also with its lack of graphics processing resources, might hinder PS4 when it comes to multiplatform titles. Plenty of them are not going to want to spend the time and money to do GPGPU on one machine if they can't do it on the other.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

@SecretPolice said:

@Wickerman777:

In X1's case, MS could have spent an additional $150.00 on stronger APU CPU instead of Kinect :o But ya didn't hear that from me. :P

Yeah, Don Mattrick was the idiot enamored with Kinect. I still suspect the guy might be cashing checks from Sony. :)

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts
@rrjim1 said:

@Wickerman777 said:

@rrjim1 said:

@SecretPolice said:

Most people know PS4 is WeakSauce so I'm pretty sure you'll get no argument here. :P

No one said the PS4 was weak, in fact it is more powerful that the X1, but not as much as people are saying.

I say it's weak all the time cuz it is. Both of these consoles are disappointing. PS4's GPU is underpowered and X1's is weak. And both of them are downright pathetic when it comes to their CPUs. Imo PS4 is 75% of the machine it should have been and X1 just 50% the machine it should have been.

This is true, but the goal here was to design a machine that could get the job done at a low price. If a console cost as much as a gaming PC not to many people would make the purchase. Just look at the amount of people that jumped ship to the PS4 because it was cheaper and suppose to be way more powerful. IMO you have the X1 a little low, more like 60-65%

I say 50% for X1 cuz there's a 40%-50% difference in GPU power and on top of that it's using outdated memory.

And I believe that had both these companies sunk $100 extra into their APUs they could have gotten the graphics processing up into the 2.5 tflops range and the CPUs could have been much better than they are as well. Yes, that would mean $500 consoles but I believe people would have been willing to pay that for proper next-gen machines. Heck, plenty of people pay that much for phones.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

@rrjim1 said:

@SecretPolice said:

Most people know PS4 is WeakSauce so I'm pretty sure you'll get no argument here. :P

No one said the PS4 was weak, in fact it is more powerful that the X1, but not as much as people are saying.

I say it's weak all the time cuz it is. Both of these consoles are disappointing. PS4's GPU is underwhelming and X1's is weak. And both of them are downright pathetic when it comes to their CPUs. Imo PS4 is 75% of the machine it should have been and X1 just 50% the machine it should have been.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

@FastRobby said:

@indigenous_euphoria said:

Yep. And lets not forget the Xbox one can off load some of the CPU processing to the cloud....giving it an even grater advantage over the ps4

Not only to the cloud, Xbox One is also able to do GPGPU. So not sure why PS4 owners think GPGPU is going to be the savior of the PS4.

It can do it but not nearly as well. ACE units are for this and PS4 has 8 of them and X1 only 2. Additionally, with so few GPU compute units to work with, 12, X1 needs what it has to render graphics. There really isn't anything to spare. Meanwhile PS4 with its 18 can dedicate 4 CUs to compute and still have 14 left to do graphics which is more than X1 has entirely.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

@evildead6789 said:

@Krelian-co said:

@evildead6789 said:

@TrooperManaic said:

Whoa you actually think the CPU slows down the GPU. I'm guessing the GPU's internal processor is there for show. The GPU core is meant to process graphical algorithms everything else is dumped on the CPU.

why don't you use a pentium 4 with a pci -e slot, put a gtx 980 in it and see how well it performs

Then use any dual core, with a 20 $ card and see how well that performs

class over.

weird, a 0.015 bump in speed on the processor and you are talking about pentium 4, but twice the gpu and ram speed and is not big deal, LOL

Well I explained it already in the first post, since he doesn't understand it, I used an extreme example

0.015 what ? terahz

nobody uses that lol

But everything you've been saying is wrong, lol. I can tell you've read some technical articles but it's obvious you didn't understand any of them.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts
@evildead6789 said:

@Wickerman777 said:

@evildead6789 said:

@CrownKingArthur said:

i haven't been keeping up with the play. in terms of recently released multiplats - does the PS4 still win every time?

not trying to rustle any jimmies, but as far as I recall PS4 is a very safe bet to have the superior multiplats.

now at the same time, to quote shakespeare 'It doesn't matter if you win by an inch or a mile, winning is winning', and from what I've seen - PS4 has routinely demonstrated superior graphics to XB1.

so, i guess where i'm going with this is this: even if your premise is true (thanks for the clarification btw), would that matter if the result was still superior multiplats for PS4?

i guess this might be a case of the tail wagging the dog.

Well not really since in gta V, you can have high speed chases without having fps drops, so in some cases the xboxone actually performs better. Games that will be cpu hogs will tend to run better on the x1 even if sony has a lot of tricks to let the gpu do cpu work, it will be a bottleneck forever, since gpu's aren't made to cpu work. If they actually manage to bridge that gap with the x1 in the cpu departement with the gpu, they will have less resources than the x1 for graphics. Don't forget it's a 7770 in there with a 256 bit bus connected straight to that esram. Because of that experts say the performance of the gpu in x1 is comparable to a hd 7790, and that is true. The difference between the hd 7790 and hd 7850 (ps4) is not that big.

The memory bandwith is not usefull as well, since the memory bandwith could only have an advantage for communication with the cpu, since it's bottlenecking, that doesn't help. You could say that it's usefull for the gpu, but that hd 7850 just needs that kind of bandwith, the x1 gpu doesn't since it has less shader cores and that esram isn't calculated within the main bandwith, so that gives a warped image.

The x1 is also 50$ cheaper and as a multimedia system the xboxone is better because it's way better at multitasking. Personally i prefer the x1 controller as well (but that's just a matter of taste) What i'm saying is, buying a ps4 for performance is ridiculous, since there's hardly any difference. It will not give you the better multiplat experience (or it is with lauch games). Some games may be marginally better, but some games will be marginally better on the x1 as well.

Sony is not very good at maximimizing performance on a console, the ps3 is a great example of it. Maybe sony will manage to do something extra late in this gen like with the last of us on the ps3, but the difference between the ps3 and x360 was way bigger than the difference between the ps4 and x1, so it's kinda hard to know what to expect, when to expect it and you'll be paying extra. At launch the ps4 was of course a way better deal if you didn't want a kinect but that time is long gone. You pay 350$ for a xboxone right now and they have some nice bundles.

Controller, exclusives, price and features is what should be your guidance for making a decision,

Lol, that was a whole lot of not knowing what the hell you're talking about. I especially got a kick out of this gem: "but the difference between the ps3 and x360 was way bigger than the difference between the ps4 and x1". The gap is not as big as PS2 vs Xbox but it absolutely is bigger than X360 vs PS3. PS3 had a craptacular GPU and much of the time Cell's power was more theoretical than real. And how many times do you have to be told that PS4 can get a big compute boost from its GPGPU capabilities?

CAN GPGPU, that remains to be seen if that will make the ps4 more performant than the xboxone, the cpu bottleneck will always be there, and the xboxone will always have an advantage there.

If the ps3's performance was purely theoretical, why did scientist buy it to build supercomputers. The animation in the last of us is a showcase of what the ps3 can do, the x360 could never pull that off, you will never see such a difference on the xboxone and ps4, because cpu and gpu are simply not that far apart.

Why this is so difficult for you to get is beyond me but I'll try to explain it a little better: PS4 has 18 active graphics CUs, X1 has 12. With PS4 4 of those graphics cores can be used to do compute. That is not the case with X1. Suppose a dev decides to use those 4 graphics cores to do compute with PS4. Right away that gives them a large compute advantage over X1. Doing so sacrifices some graphics power but what is left, 14 CUs for graphics, is still more than X1 has at its disposal for graphics altogether. So in that situation it would have more compute processing and more graphics processing than X1 does! Devs haven't been using this PS4 capability yet but they will as we get further into this generation.

As far as 360 vs PS3 goes just look at the games. 360 multiplats are equal to or better than their PS3 counterparts in plenty of instances.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

@evildead6789 said:

@04dcarraher said:

@evildead6789 said:
@04dcarraher said:
@LJS9502_basic said:

@evildead6789 said:

@CrownKingArthur said:

@evildead6789: yes i think i see the core of your argument, i also decided to read the OP.

to confirm: the core of your argument is that because both systems are CPU bottlenecked, and because the XB1 has the more computationally superior CPU, then any other power advantages the PS4 has are mitigated?

indeed

Wrong.

Fact is that PS4's gpu will provide better framerate averages then the X1.

Even with BF4 both console suffer frame drops with there is alot of action however the PS4 handles it slightly better.

yet bf4 was made when esram tools weren't available and when 10 percent was still reserved for the kinect (that's what i meant when i said 'when they fixed their software failures')

esram would not made any massive gains, esram again is mainly there for things that require fast read/write speeds like lighting,AA, and things with compute shader workloads. That extra 10% reserve from the gpu still wouldn't helped enough PS4 runs BF4 at a 50% higher resolution and still has an average 10 fps lead. However both systems are not up to the tasks in BF4 MP to keep 60 fps standard.

well, it does seem to get the x1 on par with multiplats right now.

In what parallel universe is that? PS4 multiplats have been better most of the time.

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

@evildead6789 said:

@CrownKingArthur said:

i haven't been keeping up with the play. in terms of recently released multiplats - does the PS4 still win every time?

not trying to rustle any jimmies, but as far as I recall PS4 is a very safe bet to have the superior multiplats.

now at the same time, to quote shakespeare 'It doesn't matter if you win by an inch or a mile, winning is winning', and from what I've seen - PS4 has routinely demonstrated superior graphics to XB1.

so, i guess where i'm going with this is this: even if your premise is true (thanks for the clarification btw), would that matter if the result was still superior multiplats for PS4?

i guess this might be a case of the tail wagging the dog.

Well not really since in gta V, you can have high speed chases without having fps drops, so in some cases the xboxone actually performs better. Games that will be cpu hogs will tend to run better on the x1 even if sony has a lot of tricks to let the gpu do cpu work, it will be a bottleneck forever, since gpu's aren't made to cpu work. If they actually manage to bridge that gap with the x1 in the cpu departement with the gpu, they will have less resources than the x1 for graphics. Don't forget it's a 7770 in there with a 256 bit bus connected straight to that esram. Because of that experts say the performance of the gpu in x1 is comparable to a hd 7790, and that is true. The difference between the hd 7790 and hd 7850 (ps4) is not that big.

The memory bandwith is not usefull as well, since the memory bandwith could only have an advantage for communication with the cpu, since it's bottlenecking, that doesn't help. You could say that it's usefull for the gpu, but that hd 7850 just needs that kind of bandwith, the x1 gpu doesn't since it has less shader cores and that esram isn't calculated within the main bandwith, so that gives a warped image.

The x1 is also 50$ cheaper and as a multimedia system the xboxone is better because it's way better at multitasking. Personally i prefer the x1 controller as well (but that's just a matter of taste) What i'm saying is, buying a ps4 for performance is ridiculous, since there's hardly any difference. It will not give you the better multiplat experience (or it is with lauch games). Some games may be marginally better, but some games will be marginally better on the x1 as well.

Sony is not very good at maximimizing performance on a console, the ps3 is a great example of it. Maybe sony will manage to do something extra late in this gen like with the last of us on the ps3, but the difference between the ps3 and x360 was way bigger than the difference between the ps4 and x1, so it's kinda hard to know what to expect, when to expect it and you'll be paying extra. At launch the ps4 was of course a way better deal if you didn't want a kinect but that time is long gone. You pay 350$ for a xboxone right now and they have some nice bundles.

Controller, exclusives, price and features is what should be your guidance for making a decision,

Lol, that was a whole lot of not knowing what the hell you're talking about. I especially got a kick out of this gem: "but the difference between the ps3 and x360 was way bigger than the difference between the ps4 and x1". The gap is not as big as PS2 vs Xbox but it absolutely is bigger than X360 vs PS3. PS3 had a craptacular GPU and much of the time Cell's power was more theoretical than real. And how many times do you have to be told that PS4 can get a big compute boost from its GPGPU capabilities?

Avatar image for Wickerman777
Wickerman777

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

1

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Wickerman777
Member since 2013 • 2164 Posts

They already had the makings of a great JRPG franchise for Xbox in Lost Odyssey and they abandoned it.