@jaydan: Dude you sound so pissed off.
It must be your inner conscience that's pissed off and projecting it onto me. Sorry I can't control your emotions, I'm just supplementing the conversation.
Um, okay. But, ah, I'm not the one filling up the thread with essays. *shrugs*
Writing "essays" does not equate to being "pissed off". I'm sorry but that's not your definition of writing an essay. That more or less speaks to me you really are projecting your own emotions onto a strand of posts that you don't agree with.
This won't stop the haters and fanboys from proclaiming the death of VR. I swear we'll be in 2039 with people's sunglasses doubling as VR headsets and these same fools will still be declaring that VR is dead.
So 2039? Is 2039 the year we'll finally harness the potential of VR? LMAO see this is why most of you purists are so delusional on your VR concept.
You guys live in some Dreamland some odd years in the future always hopeful of this bright future for VR. That's the PROBLEM. You guys constantly hype bright futures and yet none of you can contain when that bright future will come. Five years? Ten years? Fifty years? Do you seriously think an average consumer gives a shit about about something that is refined ten years down the pipeline? That's great, and I really hope VR can have a bright future, but that's the reason why consumers don't care about it at this point in time. Consumers focus on the NOW and what's already stable in the market. VR is simply NOT stable in the market and its future remains very uncertain, so much that even you are not sure, but at least you're honest it can take until 2039. I'm sure at least some of us here could be dead by then.
This is the fatal flaw I see of any VR purist's condescending remarks towards everyone else that's simply in touch with reality. VR is just not a sensation or a norm at this point of time, for extremely obvious reasons; but hey, hopefully by 2039 we'll see its fullest potential.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/963da/963da675603d70baa192dc0a8cb4a2a5cc9e5b8c" alt=""
? Go take your meds. I just picked a random date as an example, your rant and meltdown essay over this is weird as hell. VR is already doing well already and the market for it is growing especially now that Nintendo is about to join the market.
I guess that's really just what it comes down to when anyone comes around to criticize VR and its purists. Why even bother making these types of threads then when you purists are really only looking for people to validate your own viewpoints and to shun any arguments you don't want to make by instead posting memes as a form of dismissal. When anyone tells you that VR is not as relevant of a thing and still niche in gaming, I guess these people are just mad and out-of-touch with society. Or is it the other way around?
I'm not even dismissing the potential of VR technology. I never even said it was dead - all I said was it's not relevant in the NOW to mass demographics, and so far there is loads of uncertainty when that day will come. I don't need to bicycle pedal all the points I already made in this thread but I stand by my case you VR purists really are that delusional and out-of-touch with mass demographics.
Spend 20 minutes watching this and everything becomes much clearer in terms of timeframes.
Log in to comment