@20years @grey_fox1984 you're now stepping on that point by arguing it on the Internet dude

@OleanderX what exactly is your source "child"?

@20years @grey_fox1984 fair point

@20years @grey_fox1984 the fix for that (from MS' position) is simple- have all games available through XBL marketplace from day one. Also no revenue lost to used games may mean 39-49.99 may become the standard launch price for AAA titles

@20years @grey_fox1984 its not that I'm in support of used games blocking- I'm just personally unaffected by it because I never buy used games

@OleanderX @grey_fox1984

"Sources say new machine will require constant broadband connection, block second-hand titles, and ship with a new iteration of Kinect."

Direct quote from the article

@OleanderX see below

I have no problem with the used game protection - the required Internet connection is what pisses me off. Being in the military you're sometimes posted in barracks where you can bring a monitor and a console, but don't have an Internet connection. Looks like ill use those times to catch up on 360/PS3/Vita games

@kramer_inc Hahaha, your comment should be framed at Sony so they get the motivation to start pushing for proper games at their board meetings when the 'why isn't vita selling?' question comes up

Here's hoping for good sales- I'd hate to see this tank the Killzone series the way Burning Skies did to Resistance. I still think hinging the future of a great series on one portable outing was a bad idea- particularly a rushed one given to Nihilistic.

But Guerilla (and what I'll assume is the remnants of Psygnosis? they were based in Cambridge if I'm not mistaken and they certainly know their way around the Vita after Wipeout 2048) is great at making shooters, so I hope this turns the Vita's tide