It doesn't matter how long the PS3 has been out compared to the 360, or how long the dev kits have been out. That is all Sony's fault. The current number of AAs and AAAs on the 360 as compared to the PS3 doesn't lie, and for gamers should be the only numbers that matter.

accameron

WTF????? Who the hell cares about A ratings in real life. If you like the game play it, I know plenty of AAA games that I wouldn't touch with a 15 foot barge poll.

due to its design, it also means that the GPU will be firing on more cylinders compared to the PS3s GPU.osan0

See, the PS3 is impotent.

I think it's a fair assumption that both platforms are on an equal playing field. Microsoft Dev platforms are UNBEATABLE in ease of use and reference materials, so even if the 360 is slightly less powerful, the development process is straight forward and easy. It's not like we've seen the full potential of either gaming system yet anyway, I mean look at RE:4 on the GC. That game came out nearly at the end of th GCs life cycle and pwned everything else graphically.

PC buff who's been wondering what the console kids have been up to

ROFL. So console kids, what have you been up to?

I've played a lot of FPSs and I can bodly say Halo 3's Single Player is solid story-telling and a lot of fun. Plus the general gaming world these days prefers multiplayer. If a more in-depth multiplayer comes at the expense of the songle player, so be it.tccavey2

I don't know where you get that from. I know TONS of people that game hardcore offline but don't touch online either due to lag or price of broadband or just because they prefer SP.

What about The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess?007_jamesbond

I concur, TP is, imo, the best adventure title released this gen. I know most of you will say that it's last gen but realisticly it was released this Gen and on a Current Gen console as well as the GC so I consider it a Next Gen title. And as always, the Zelda level design is top notch.

It will probably get an 8.0 for reasons like "mario hasn't got voice acting" and "it's not Halo 3".Lilac_Benjie

Imagine the uproar if it actually listed "cons: Not Halo 3" lol

Na it looks like a really awesome game but 9.5 max, I don't think it will get a 10.

[QUOTE="lilhomes"]Without blu-ray. ps3 is useless.BlueBarad

Isn't that THE reason to own a PS3?

I thought it was the uber awesome exclusives....oh wait...nm.

Na but in all seriousness, you can't account all of each platforms sucsess to one certian function. Apart from the Wii. This thread is pointless, especially considering a lot of the 360 owners I know don't have broadband internet or wifi.

mario galaxy has no shot as with any other wii game because it does not have next gen graphics

audioaxes

Pfft.
Firstly, have you seen pix or vids of this game in action, it looks pretty darn impressive considering the hardware it's running on.
Secondly, it's graphical standards are lower, if a 360 or PS3 game came out looking like crap it would get more points off because of the capabilities of it's native system. It's the same with the Wii, no one expects it to look as good as the likes of Halo 3 and Crysis (Though the art ****sure as hell nearly pulls it off)

In conclusion, you fail.