@yukushi: They do though, the problem is they invest tons of money in marketing, and developer loyalty only to cancel the game to exercise their power. Not thinking of gamers, only their might.
@BlackBaldwin: The power increase from the PS4 to the PS4 Pro was significant enough to rejuvenate my interest in console gaming again. I abandoned all but the best of the best exclusives on the base PS4 and focused all my attention on PC gaming. The power difference between the Scorpio and the Pro could be enough to fix the little nagging things that still bother me about the Pro that I can now possibly enjoy on the Scorpio. There's no unsafe cool aid here. The prospect of having two consoles that both have their strengths and weaknesses is better than just having one.
@bmoreninja777: Making an incredible and memorable E3 presentation is not all the same thing as "dethroning". Shifting the scales could take years and I never implied that at all.
I doubt they'll drop any bombs now that they are so careful about that with all the recent cancellations. I bet we'll see a lot of talk about the games and their technological relationship directly with Scorpio.
Xbox Elite with the Elite controller bundled would be great. Although, I have already personally asked Phil Spencer to keep the Scorpio name has had so many other people so that would be the likeliest choice. Having such low expectations of Microsoft over the last several years I would have voted 720 but the Scorpio, for a console anyways, looks like a stellar unit and no one should have any reason to hate on it. You hate on Microsoft for the lack of games, not the console.
@gamingdevil800: My point was it seems the Scorpio is designed to help improve games without the need of patching. It's very possible that by the end of the year, there will be more games running at close to 4K on the Scorpio than there will be on the Pro. That would be fantastic and create more heat for Sony (Mark Cerny in particular) to do something about it.
KhanWasHere's comments