quakeknight1991's forum posts

Avatar image for quakeknight1991
quakeknight1991

1528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

16

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By quakeknight1991
Member since 2006 • 1528 Posts
@quakeknight1991 said:

Ugh, I hope the rest of the show is not just about VR.

Did they not say it was going to cost as much as a PS4? That is basically a guarantee that Playstation VR is going to die at release.

Avatar image for quakeknight1991
quakeknight1991

1528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

16

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 quakeknight1991
Member since 2006 • 1528 Posts

Ugh, I hope the rest of the show is not just about VR.

Avatar image for quakeknight1991
quakeknight1991

1528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

16

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 quakeknight1991
Member since 2006 • 1528 Posts

Yeah, I kinda agree with people here. After gamespots Fallout 4 review, I am not sure how anyone could take the reviews of this site seriously anymore.

Avatar image for quakeknight1991
quakeknight1991

1528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

16

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#6 quakeknight1991
Member since 2006 • 1528 Posts

@MrGeezer said:
@quakeknight1991 said:
@MrGeezer said:

@mesome713: So, you admit that the SJW's aren't censoring shit, and that any anger about this game not being released in the west should be directed entirely towards Koei Tecmo?

Again, like I said they are indirectly censoring it. Releasing this game in the west means having the press start a smear campaign against Koei Tecmo because like I said the mainstream press is dominated by SJWs. So perhaps they just dont want to deal with smear campaigns by SJWs. By the way, the press has done smear campaigns against KT in the past because of DOA.

http://abload.de/img/deadoralivewesteysro.png

Being chickenshit cowards who can't handle when someone talks bad about them, doesn't mean they're being censored. I mean, come on dude. You're saying that now people can't even fucking criticize the game without censoring them. What the hell are "artists" supposed to be? Little babies that we can't talk bad about for fear of hurting their little feelings? I thought it was the SJW's who were supposed to be thin-skinned little babies.

There is a difference between saying the game is bad because the gameplay is terrible and saying the developers are misoginist pigs. One is criticism and the other is a personal attack meant to undermine the personal reputation of the developer. You can be sure SJWs will focus on personal attacks.

Avatar image for quakeknight1991
quakeknight1991

1528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

16

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 quakeknight1991
Member since 2006 • 1528 Posts

@MrGeezer said:

@mesome713: So, you admit that the SJW's aren't censoring shit, and that any anger about this game not being released in the west should be directed entirely towards Koei Tecmo?

Again, like I said they are indirectly censoring it. Releasing this game in the west means having the press start a smear campaign against Koei Tecmo because like I said the mainstream press is dominated by SJWs. So perhaps they just dont want to deal with smear campaigns by SJWs. By the way, the press has done smear campaigns against KT in the past because of DOA.

http://abload.de/img/deadoralivewesteysro.png

Avatar image for quakeknight1991
quakeknight1991

1528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

16

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By quakeknight1991
Member since 2006 • 1528 Posts

Did someone post this?

http://blogjob.com/oneangrygamer/2015/11/former-ign-and-gamespot-journalists-threaten-play-asia-for-supporting-dead-or-alive-xtreme-3/

Avatar image for quakeknight1991
quakeknight1991

1528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

16

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By quakeknight1991
Member since 2006 • 1528 Posts

@MrGeezer said:

@mesome713 "Smaller company"? Yeah, as in, "the shit isn't selling very well."

How well did DOAX2 do? I know it wasn't a TOTAL financial flop in the west. Sure, SOME people bought it. But it wasn't exactly a big hit, was it? Even taking the "feminist/sjw outrage" out of the equation, is there ANY reason to believe that this game would have done much better? This isn't even making a judgement about the game's quality or the people who like it, but you've kind of got to admit that it's sort of a niche title. It's a fucking beach volleyball game about looking at pretty girls in bikinis. Seriously, how fucking well do you expect that to sell? Niche title. Not a whole lot of demand for that, even WITHOUT sjw's complaining about it.

Point is, this is all about MONEY, dude. And we're talking about a title that wasn't exactly a huge hit in western territories even BEFORE the current sjw mentality took hold. No one has provided a single goddamn example of sjw's preventing the company from releasing the game in the west. It looks a hell of a lot like these games weren't terribly financially successful in western territories anyway, and might be less financially successful given the current social climate. How is that a bad thing? It's STILL about whether or not it's fiscally responsible to release the game, and companies that don't exercise fiscal responsibility quickly end up losing the ability to release ANY games. People are trying to frame this about an issue of artistic freedom, and I'm like, "seriously?" It's a smaller company releasing a niche title in a series that isn't exactly a huge hit, and we're somehow blaming its lack of a release on the fact that some people complain about it? People complain about all sorts of shit, dude. If their product isn't popular enough to weather a little bit of criticism then they probably SHOULDN'T be releasing it in those territories. That's just called "not flushing millions of dollars down the toilet." People talk about sjw's being self-entitled, but what the hell? Are we gamers so self-entitled that we expect a company to lose millions of dollars releasing a product in a territory where that product doesn't sell well, just so that we can give a "**** you" to the sjw's who were probably never gonna buy the game anyway? If people actually bought that shit, then Koei Tecmo WOULD be releasing it regardless of complaints. But no one bought it last time, because no one fucking cares about the game. The only reason people are wanting it now is because they hate sjw's and the sjw's SUPPOSEDLY kept the game from being released.

They certainly have not directly prevented this game from releasing in the west but its also true that they are to blame for the hostile enviroment towards these kind of games nowadays. They are at least trying to brainwash gamers into thinking that people who enjoy these sort of games are misogynist pigs/sexist and rapists. And no these are not just a few bloggers, SJWs are basically controlling the entire mainstream press.

Avatar image for quakeknight1991
quakeknight1991

1528

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

16

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By quakeknight1991
Member since 2006 • 1528 Posts

@sts106mat said:

@silversix_: @nyadc: @quadknight:

you guys are the desperate? wow

Lets say for the sake of argument that these games are indeed meant for "desperate" people. So what? Why cant there be games that appeal to these people? I thought SJWs wanted diversity in gaming and did not advocate for censorship.