[QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="CubeJL"][QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="CubeJL"][QUOTE="rahzel54"][QUOTE="CubeJL"][QUOTE="mohammad112388"]http://www.gamesradar.com/us/ps3/game/features/article.jsp?articleId=20070214154134589045§ionId=1003&releaseId=20060726163237511007
But teh 360...its more powerful.......eeeeehhhhhhh...wrong
CubeJL
Putting asside the fact that the 360 is getting the same graphics patches the PS3 has received...
Go back, chrnoicle the numerous 360/PS3 multiplats which have nearly ALL come back in favor of the 360, and then try to make this silly argument.
no its not... watch the video interview on gamesradar with pete hines (my post a few up)... he specifically says only 1-2 visual enhancements are coming to the 360, and most are exclusive to the ps3 because of its architecture. again, i'm not saying the ps3 owns the 360... but clearly there are things the ps3 excel in, and vice versa. both systems are pretty equal.I have not listened to the discussion you're citing, granted.
Even so...I think you're giving the PS3 way too much credit. Oblivion represents the first of over a handful of titles that even has the POSSIBILITY of looking better than its 360 contemporary.
I don't know how any fair-minded PS3 fan can make an allegation that the PS3 is on equal terms, let alone stronger, than the 360 at this stage.
lmfao.... wow... just, wow. same to you my friend... i don't see how YOU can make an allegation that the 360 is above the ps3, power wise.Sir, have you not seen the reviews for multiplat PS3/360 games? Even games like NBA Street Homecourt were cited as looking better on the 360 (visa vis On the Spot). Does anything on the PS3 look as good as Gears?
This is "how" I can claim that the 360 is more powerful at this stage. It's what you might call "evidence".
typical lemming... you do know that the majority of ps3 launch titles were 360 ports? you do know that the ps3's dev tools are far less mature than the 360s? you do know that ALL the multiplat games that do look better on the 360, dont use anywhere near what the ps3 OR the 360 are capable of? do you honestly think that the ps3 isn't capable of the graphical quality of say, Tony Hawk, when some games on the ps3 are technically and graphically head and shoulders above it? i meant... if it looks and runs worse on the ps3, that must mean that Tony Hawk uses the ps3 to the max, right? please... all this means is the dev tools and dev time were limited and the game was poorly optimized. and not all multiplat games thus far look inferior on the ps3... FNR3 arguably looks better, and now oblivion. once the dev tools for the ps3 mature, well start to see better looking games. honestly, to me, its good news that ps3 games already look nearly the same as 360 games (if not better). the 360 is 1-years old and the ps3 is 3 months old.Well, I appreciate you categorizing me and calling me names. I have yet to make this argument personal.
At any rate, the series of "you do know" statements above are nothing more than excuses. It doesn't matter if its 360 to PS3, Atari 2600 to PC to Xbox to Gamecube to PS3...the bottom line is that these games look and run better on the Xbox 360 regardless of any reasons.
This is concrete evidence to support my claim that the 360 is outperforming the PS3 at this stage. Can you offer the same support for the PS3? How many games look better on the PS3 at this point? You'll find the answer to this question is "not many".
And to point out one last thing--along the lines of the PS3 only being available for three months--this is something that should have worked to the PS3s advantage. Usually, technology which comes out at a later date has some tangible advantage in terms of performance. The bottom line here is that we shouldn't even be having this discussion if everything Sony promised was reality.
i guess only time will tell... obviously i disagree with you, but all this arguing is pointless. 
Log in to comment