How do creationists explain Neanderthals and the other species of man?[NEW POLL]

[QUOTE="the_one34"]Macroevolution = many instances of microevolution over a long period.ZeRo-ZeN

Have you ever met a Neanderthal? No, of course not. You're simply going by what scientists have told you based on fossils dug up from the ground. But how do you know those fossils aren't just as old as us? I believe that God created the Earth around 6,000 years give or take a few hundred years and these fossils that get dug up were created at the same time as man and everything else. In other words, God created an Earth with the illusion of being millions of years old by inserting fossils of creatures that never existed and shaping geographic features. In His magnificance, he made a world for us that appears to be timeless.

mysterylobster

lol by this logic its suprising that u believe in god, u met him yet ?

[QUOTE="the_one34"]Macroevolution = many instances of microevolution over a long period.ZeRo-ZeN

Nice copy/paste there. Both micro and macroevolution use the same process, the only difference being time. zakkro

[QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"]Ctrl-C + Ctrl-V

.the_one34

Macroevolution = many instances of microevolution over a long period.

lol @ zero zen quote

[QUOTE="the_one34"]

[QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"][QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"]Ctrl-C + Ctrl-V

.xMOBSTER23x

Macroevolution = many instances of microevolution over a long period.

lol @ zero zen quote

[QUOTE="zakkro"]Nice copy/paste there. Both micro and macroevolution use the same process, the only difference being time. ZeRo-ZeN

[QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"][QUOTE="zakkro"]Nice copy/paste there. Both micro and macroevolution use the same process, the only difference being time. zakkro

[QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"][QUOTE="zakkro"]Nice copy/paste there. Both micro and macroevolution use the same process, the only difference being time. ZeRo-ZeN

I believe in micro-evolution (little changes even over along period of time)ZeRo-ZeN

Which would be macroevolution. And it isn't one species turning into another... if you look at the phylogenic tree you can see that is clearly not the case.

[QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"][QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"][QUOTE="zakkro"]Nice copy/paste there. Both micro and macroevolution use the same process, the only difference being time. zakkro

I believe in micro-evolution (little changes even over along period of time)ZeRo-ZeN

Which would be macroevolution. And it isn't one species turning into another... if you look at the phylogenic tree you can see that is clearly not the case.

k but both things where said in the same post...ZeRo-ZeN

[QUOTE="mysterylobster"]

Have you ever met a Neanderthal? No, of course not. You're simply going by what scientists have told you based on fossils dug up from the ground. But how do you know those fossils aren't just as old as us? I believe that God created the Earth around 6,000 years give or take a few hundred years and these fossils that get dug up were created at the same time as man and everything else. In other words, God created an Earth with the illusion of being millions of years old by inserting fossils of creatures that never existed and shaping geographic features. In His magnificance, he made a world for us that appears to be timeless.

lazyhoboguy

lol by this logic its suprising that u believe in god, u met him yet ?

Like the others, please read past the first sentence before responding. Thx!

This isn't just about having no contact with neanderthals, it's about the only proof being fossils. If you read my whole post, you'd see why that has nothing to do with meeting God or Einstein or whoever.

[QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"]k but both things where said in the same post...zakkro

[QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"]k but both things where said in the same post...ZeRo-ZeN

[QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"][QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"]k but both things where said in the same post...zakkro

I need more evidence first. Preferably the evidence Darwin was looking for.ZeRo-ZeN

[QUOTE="MetalGear_Ninty"][QUOTE="mysterylobster"]

Have you ever met a Neanderthal? No, of course not. You're simply going by what scientists have told you based on fossils dug up from the ground. But how do you know those fossils aren't just as old as us? I believe that God created the Earth around 6,000 years give or take a few hundred years and these fossils that get dug up were created at the same time as man and everything else. In other words, God created an Earth with the illusion of being millions of years old by inserting fossils of creatures that never existed and shaping geographic features. In His magnificance, he made a world for us that appears to be timeless.

mysterylobster

Have you ever met Henry VIII, then how do you know he exists?

Historical accounts, etc. We have no such resources to judge whether Neanderthal's existed. All we have are fossils, which as I said, were created by God when he created everything else.

Ok, I'll bite. Where in the Bible does it mention that God created fossil's of dinos, Neanderthals, and all other long extinct species to form an illusion. Don't bother reading up on it, it doesn't. And using common sense and reason, why would a God do that? Especially one who you believe has a grand plan for every movement in the world. I have no problem with anyone wanting to believe in whatever God they choose, but to create explanations for facts that go against the Bible is just silly, and makes all "young earth believers" silly.

[QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"]I need more evidence first. Preferably the evidence Darwin was looking for.zakkro

These so-called transitional fossils fall into the same category discussed earlier. They were there at the time of the Earth's creation, and therefore represent no animal who lived.

[QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"]I need more evidence first. Preferably the evidence Darwin was looking for.mysterylobster

These so-called transitional fossils fall into the same category discussed earlier. They were there at the time of the Earth's creation, and therefore represent no animal who lived.

[QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"]I need more evidence first. Preferably the evidence Darwin was looking for.mysterylobster

These so-called transitional fossils fall into the same category discussed earlier. They were there at the time of the Earth's creation, and therefore represent no animal who lived.

[QUOTE="mysterylobster"]

[QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"]I need more evidence first. Preferably the evidence Darwin was looking for.zakkro

These so-called transitional fossils fall into the same category discussed earlier. They were there at the time of the Earth's creation, and therefore represent no animal who lived.

The bible.

[QUOTE="mysterylobster"]

[QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"]I need more evidence first. Preferably the evidence Darwin was looking for.ZeRo-ZeN

These so-called transitional fossils fall into the same category discussed earlier. They were there at the time of the Earth's creation, and therefore represent no animal who lived.

[QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="mysterylobster"]

[QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"]I need more evidence first. Preferably the evidence Darwin was looking for.astiop

These so-called transitional fossils fall into the same category discussed earlier. They were there at the time of the Earth's creation, and therefore represent no animal who lived.

The bible.

[QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"][QUOTE="mysterylobster"]

[QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"]I need more evidence first. Preferably the evidence Darwin was looking for.zakkro

These so-called transitional fossils fall into the same category discussed earlier. They were there at the time of the Earth's creation, and therefore represent no animal who lived.

I think you didn't get my joke :pZeRo-ZeN

Oh, okay. Proof? zakkro

You are right, the bible isn't proof. The biblica raptorica is, were it clearly states that they did exist, just not as long ago as we'd think.

[QUOTE="mysterylobster"]

[QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"]I need more evidence first. Preferably the evidence Darwin was looking for.zakkro

These so-called transitional fossils fall into the same category discussed earlier. They were there at the time of the Earth's creation, and therefore represent no animal who lived.

If you think about it logically, then you can see why no proof is needed. God created man soon after he formed the Earth. So how can there be fossils found in the Earth that are of animals that existed MILLIONS of years before man? It makes no sense. The only conclusion you can reach is that the Earth as created by God already had evidence of great age when it was first made, just as a movie set designer might make something to look very old.

As yes, many parts of the Bible have been proven scientifically (I direct you to the recent book titled The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Bible). The creation story in the Bible has never been disproven by science. Last I read, they were trying to understand the formation of the universe by banging electrons together. LOL!

God created man soon after he formed the Earth.

mysterylobster

[QUOTE="zakkro"]Oh, okay. Proof? astiop

You are right, the bible isn't proof. The biblica raptorica is, were it clearly states that they did exist, just not as long ago as we'd think.

[QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="mysterylobster"]

[QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"]I need more evidence first. Preferably the evidence Darwin was looking for.mysterylobster

These so-called transitional fossils fall into the same category discussed earlier. They were there at the time of the Earth's creation, and therefore represent no animal who lived.

If you think about it logically, then you can see why no proof is needed. God created man soon after he formed the Earth. So how can there be fossils found in the Earth that are of animals that existed MILLIONS of years before man? It makes no sense. The only conclusion you can reach is that the Earth as created by God already had evidence of great age when it was first made, just as a movie set designer might make something to look very old.

Wrong, the Raptor God made humans after he wiped out the dinosaurs, because his son raptor jesus failed to erase sin from the dinos...

[QUOTE="mysterylobster"]

God created man soon after he formed the Earth.

zakkro

[QUOTE="astiop"]

[QUOTE="zakkro"]Oh, okay. Proof? ZeRo-ZeN

You are right, the bible isn't proof. The biblica raptorica is, were it clearly states that they did exist, just not as long ago as we'd think.

Well, it has stomped all over it unintentionaly...

[QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"][QUOTE="astiop"]

[QUOTE="zakkro"]Oh, okay. Proof? astiop

You are right, the bible isn't proof. The biblica raptorica is, were it clearly states that they did exist, just not as long ago as we'd think.

Well, it has stomped all over it unintentionaly...

[QUOTE="astiop"][QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"][QUOTE="astiop"]

[QUOTE="zakkro"]Oh, okay. Proof? ZeRo-ZeN

You are right, the bible isn't proof. The biblica raptorica is, were it clearly states that they did exist, just not as long ago as we'd think.

Well, it has stomped all over it unintentionaly...

Contradict it :|

[QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="mysterylobster"]

God created man soon after he formed the Earth.

ZeRo-ZeN

[QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"][QUOTE="astiop"][QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"][QUOTE="astiop"]

[QUOTE="zakkro"]Oh, okay. Proof? astiop

You are right, the bible isn't proof. The biblica raptorica is, were it clearly states that they did exist, just not as long ago as we'd think.

Well, it has stomped all over it unintentionaly...

Contradict it :|

That's why creationism is not science.ZeRo-ZeN

I know. I thought by "have nothing to do with each other" you meant one can co-exist with the other (while both creationism and science being correct at the same time).

[QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"][QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="mysterylobster"]

God created man soon after he formed the Earth.

zakkro

[QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"][QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="mysterylobster"]

God created man soon after he formed the Earth.

ZeRo-ZeN

well according to the bible, there used to be people who lived to be 900+ years old. And obviously a 900+ man would be diffrent then people of today. Silenthps

Any clue how many generations of them there were?

[QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"][QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"][QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="mysterylobster"]

God created man soon after he formed the Earth.

zakkro

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]well according to the bible, there used to be people who lived to be 900+ years old. And obviously a 900+ man would be diffrent then people of today. astiop

Any clue how many generations of them there were?

[QUOTE="Silenthps"]well according to the bible, there used to be people who lived to be 900+ years old. And obviously a 900+ man would be diffrent then people of today. astiop

Any clue how many generations of them there were?

nope theres no proof I can offer that they even existedZeRo-ZeN

[QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"]nope theres no proof I can offer that they even existedzakkro

[QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="mysterylobster"]

[QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"]I need more evidence first. Preferably the evidence Darwin was looking for.mysterylobster

These so-called transitional fossils fall into the same category discussed earlier. They were there at the time of the Earth's creation, and therefore represent no animal who lived.

If you think about it logically, then you can see why no proof is needed. God created man soon after he formed the Earth. So how can there be fossils found in the Earth that are of animals that existed MILLIONS of years before man? It makes no sense. The only conclusion you can reach is that the Earth as created by God already had evidence of great age when it was first made, just as a movie set designer might make something to look very old.

As yes, many parts of the Bible have been proven scientifically (I direct you to the recent book titled The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Bible). The creation story in the Bible has never been disproven by science. Last I read, they were trying to understand the formation of the universe by banging electrons together. LOL!

lol I get it now, you're a fake troll. You all had us gong there.

[QUOTE="mysterylobster"][QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="mysterylobster"]

[QUOTE="zakkro"][QUOTE="ZeRo-ZeN"]I need more evidence first. Preferably the evidence Darwin was looking for.Red-XIII

These so-called transitional fossils fall into the same category discussed earlier. They were there at the time of the Earth's creation, and therefore represent no animal who lived.

If you think about it logically, then you can see why no proof is needed. God created man soon after he formed the Earth. So how can there be fossils found in the Earth that are of animals that existed MILLIONS of years before man? It makes no sense. The only conclusion you can reach is that the Earth as created by God already had evidence of great age when it was first made, just as a movie set designer might make something to look very old.

As yes, many parts of the Bible have been proven scientifically (I direct you to the recent book titled The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Bible). The creation story in the Bible has never been disproven by science. Last I read, they were trying to understand the formation of the universe by banging electrons together. LOL!

lol I get it now, you're a fake troll. You all had us gong there.

I don't think so I met people like him beforeZeRo-ZeN