[QUOTE="deadpool86x"]
Sorry, but wrong. If you name me any two organisms on Earth, I can list you all of their common traits.
Ok, common house fly and a Rose.
Youor claim is false.
Your opinion, not fact
[QUOTE="deadpool86x"]
5. Once again, that is not a logical defense in the slightest. You again think that one mutated creature in a species that is composed of possible hundreds of billions like insects, repopulated the entire species with that one trait that lingered onward for billions of years. Sorry, but flies that exist in Russia adapted the same traits as those found in Canada. Separated by thousands of miles and subjected to different conditions but all of them adapted the same way? You think because we have remnants of a tailbone that we are somehow related to another species? Thats not at all proven or scientific fact and is 100% fabricated opinion.
GabuEx
If we did not evolve from an animal with a tail, then why do we have a tailbone?
well, you think its possible for things to naturally occur, so i believe that our traits naturally came to be. There is a need for it, permits limited movement between the sacrum and the coccyx. I don't think we evolved it from anything else, i think its a vital part of the human structure.
If flightless birds did not evolve from birds that flew, then why do they have hollow bones?
Since when to genetic mutations make sense all the time? Your argument for that is the same as a group of incestuous kids having more kids with more horrid mutations and spawning off a new type of human.
No offense, but I believe that you are being wilfully ignorant here: you are not even attempting to understand anything at all, and are merely attempting to understand the barest essentials of the argument so you can attempt to mount a rebuttal.
I am in fact trying to understand the views of others. You seem to be unable to think outside the box and are proving the point i made in my first post where i said why do they always reply with "OH YA, well why is this or that then???" Thats not a valid excuse for your beliefs, if anything is willfully ignorant, it would be the person who keeps says "Oh ya, well how come they have this or that trait?" If you cant think for yourself, dont post, and your inability to explain it doesnt justify anyone not believe in god doing it all
Getting back to what this was about, I believe that evolution is set forth by a control, a god or whatever you wish to call it. I do not believe that 0 can produce a number that not only repeats itself infinitely, but is a specific number that adapted itself to fit the conditions around it on a universal scale. The day you can justify 0+0=any number is the day I wont believe in god.
the idea that God is 1 and always existed is mathematically and scientifically accurate, and that 1 always existed and created. 1+x=y
the idea that there is no god and the universe always existed as a singularity represented by 0, but then created something else on an infinitely repeating and SPECIFIC to the needs of life at the start of all things is NONSENSE. 0+0=0. Those who dont believe in god denounce all mathematics. the idea that nothing created itself and then something else and again something else repeating a specific number
deadpool86x
What you have just said here is a meaningless ad hoc combination of science and mathematics that is neither valid science nor valid mathematics, and as such there is nothing even here for me to rebut, as you have made no coherent claims that can be rebutted.
Once again, your opinion. While flawed and its apparent you dont have the ability to think outside the box, all I can say it continue thinking 0+0= a complex number. I believe math is law and cant be changed, you believe that on a tuesday 15 billion years ago these math laws didnt exist or could be broken for a short time.
Log in to comment