The GameInformer Halo: Reach Screens *56k Insert Witty Saying Here*

[QUOTE="Avian005"]

[QUOTE="AdobeArtist"]

This is ludicrous. The only ones talking "graphics king" are the sonyfans claiming that 360fans are calling it GK. NO actual halo/360 fans are making this claim. You can't create an argument that others made :roll:

Anyway, big improvement from Halo 3. Like the weapons, the armor detail and the Jackals sure got an image boost.

2mrw

We expected Reach to be graphically improved, and more up to current standards. Again, graphics king was NOT proclaimed by any actual 360 gamers (and excluding fakeboys).

[QUOTE="2mrw"][QUOTE="Avian005"]You're right. I haven't seen that many people claim Reach will be GK. I was wondering the same thing. Apparently others need to make fake claims to have an argument here.

AdobeArtist

We expected Reach to be graphically improved, and more up to current standards. Again, graphics king was NOT proclaimed by any actual 360 gamers (and excluding fakeboys).

[QUOTE="2mrw"][QUOTE="Avian005"]You're right. I haven't seen that many people claim Reach will be GK. I was wondering the same thing. Apparently others need to make fake claims to have an argument here.

I havent seen any in this thread thou....So why when people post screens of Halo:Reach it constantly turns into a graphics war!!

Enough, We agree already, Lets just talk about the game already!!

I'm hugely dissapointed bye Halo Reach graphics, from all the hype i was hoping for something that would blow me away. The character models are great, but the enviroments are just plain awfull.

[QUOTE="Avian005"]

[QUOTE="2mrw"] in fact there are no lemming that can claim that after these screen shots, but believe, lemmengs were going crazy about how good halo:reach graphics will be in many other previous threads.2mrw

and it will be the biggest title oin 2010, so they are right

[QUOTE="Avian005"]

[QUOTE="2mrw"] in fact there are no lemming that can claim that after these screen shots, but believe, lemmengs were going crazy about how good halo:reach graphics will be in many other previous threads.2mrw

How the hell did this thread get to 28 pages already?SpiritOfFire117

The same thing was said about Resistance 2, your claims are meaninless without proof. Just another baseless bash you pulled from your you know where as damage control in responce to Halo Reach's unimpressive showing.

The developers never said, " It's 256 players but we are only going to limit it to 35 players at a time" :lol: the things people say to try to justify their praise for something else, it's amazing

playharderfool

how was the Reach showing "unimpressive?"

I think it looks amazing especially the elite pic :o I cant imagine battles with 40 enemies with that quality!! Probably it wont look as beautifull as Uncharted2 but with those huge environments and the amount of things going on at the same time, im pretty sure technically it will be as good if not better than anything on any console atm.

Anyway.....the hate on this game is getting really ridiculous. Just proves Halo really scares many ppl arround here.

The only thing this game could have a chance of looking better than UC2's is the box art.

IPWNDU2

I think it looks amazing especially the elite pic :o I cant imagine battles with 40 enemies with that quality!! Probably it wont look as beautifull as Uncharted2 but with those huge environments and the amount of things going on at the same time, im pretty sure technically it will be as good if not better than anything on any console atm.

Anyway.....the hate on this game is getting really ridiculous. Just proves Halo really scares many ppl arround here.

meh looks like a halo game.....i guess that is a good thing

whoa, this thread exploded. i figured everyone had seen these pics, i got my GI a week ago. anyways the game looks good enough at the moment, considering they have over half a year to tweak and polish. im more interested in the gameplay. apparantly theres some secret multiplayer mode in the game they havent talked about yet. i wonder if theyre gonna try to have a mode with more than 16 players. it seems like the game engine could handle it. a thinggame mode with 24 to 32 players could be awesome if they maybe add objectives or something. and maybe some kind of persistant character progression or custimization.

500 comments just shows, that no matter what any fanboy says, Halo is a big event in SW, and gets a crapload of attention. Remember the ODST sticky anyone? That was the biggest bovine ownage I saw in several months!

500 comments just shows, that no matter what any fanboy says, Halo is a big event in SW, and gets a crapload of attention. Remember the ODST sticky anyone? That was the biggest bovine ownage I saw in several months!

siddhu33

500 comments just shows, that no matter what any fanboy says, Halo is a big event in SW, and gets a crapload of attention. Remember the ODST sticky anyone? That was the biggest bovine ownage I saw in several months!

siddhu33

I dont see how these are amazing graphics

[QUOTE="siddhu33"]

500 comments just shows, that no matter what any fanboy says, Halo is a big event in SW, and gets a crapload of attention. Remember the ODST sticky anyone? That was the biggest bovine ownage I saw in several months!

2mrw

half of those posts you talk about are from users in denial, that wish they could play the game :)

[QUOTE="Shad0ki11"]

Just what the hell is this vehicle doing here?! It's totally out of place....much like the Warthog vehicles in the previous games. I want vehicles with some goddamn imagination! Same thing goes with the Mjollnir armor and a number of the alien species. Halo games are great quality, but from a design standpoint it's like "wtf were they thinking??!"

R3FURBISHED

That's not my point. That vehicle is totally out of place in a sci fi fantasy game; it's too plain.

[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="Vadamee"] Since when is PS3 capable of 16xMSAA? Those are bull shots I'm afraid. lol

[QUOTE="HerzogJan"]

[QUOTE="Vadamee"] Since when is PS3 capable of 16xMSAA? Those are bull shots I'm afraid. lol

Vadamee

The power of PS3 mesmerizes and surprises, trust me the game looks like this and this is a ugly shot imo.

I have to be honest, I like the way that shot looks with the blur.

[QUOTE="Vadamee"][QUOTE="HerzogJan"]

The power of PS3 mesmerizes and surprises, trust me the game looks like this and this is a ugly shot imo.

topgunmv

I have to be honest, I like the way that shot looks with the blur.

Same here. A blurred background is supposed to bring attention to the foreground, which is a technique often used in cinematography. Very nice.

[QUOTE="R3FURBISHED"]

[QUOTE="Shad0ki11"]

Just what the hell is this vehicle doing here?! It's totally out of place....much like the Warthog vehicles in the previous games. I want vehicles with some goddamn imagination! Same thing goes with the Mjollnir armor and a number of the alien species. Halo games are great quality, but from a design standpoint it's like "wtf were they thinking??!"

That's not my point. That vehicle is totally out of place in a sci fi fantasy game; it's too plain.

lol at the fanboys posting bullshots of uncharted 2,the game is 2xMSAA and suddenly it went to 25xMSAA with those screenshots :lol:Tessellation

Looks Like Halo 3. :|

This thread is hilarious. Best thread of SW so far in 2010.Sollet

[QUOTE="Sollet"]This thread is hilarious. Best thread of SW so far in 2010.mitu123

[QUOTE="Panosola"][QUOTE="delta3074"]wow, it looks really good, better than i expected, it's no graphics knig like UC2, but it doesn't need to be, as someone said earlier, i would rather play the replayability king than the graphics king, this game will have more staying power than halo 3Stevo_the_gamer

[QUOTE="Sollet"]This thread is hilarious. Best thread of SW so far in 2010.mitu123

Honestly, it's very impressive looking as it stands. There is no need to improve it any further (although im sure they will) For a game of this magnitude it looks great. Games like UC2 and Killzone 2 benifit from being based in corridors. Even Far Cry 2 is mainly based in small paths.

Not to mention Halo has far more Ai at once. Obviously Cows will forget about this and claim UC2 is the most amazing game ever created.

I've been around SW for a good amount of time and yet, this **** thread keeps going and that surprises me - ehh, I dunno. :? I bet in six months we'll see even better visuals of Reach - wanna bet ? :P

I've been around SW for a good amount of time and yet, this **** thread keeps going and that surprises me - ehh, I dunno. :? I bet in six months we'll see even better visuals of Reach - wanna bet ? :P

SecretPolice

I've been around SW for a good amount of time and yet, this **** thread keeps going and that surprises me - ehh, I dunno. :? I bet in six months we'll see even better visuals of Reach - wanna bet ? :P

SecretPolice

Im sure it will satisfy many Halo fans, but graphically, it's not too impessive so far. Maybe the 360 has hit its graphical limit. :? Not that graphical improvements determine how fun a game will be. Ive played 8 bit games that are more fun than many current gen games.

[QUOTE="Tessellation"]lol at the fanboys posting bullshots of uncharted 2,the game is 2xMSAA and suddenly it went to 25xMSAA with those screenshots :lol:mitu123

[QUOTE="SecretPolice"]

I've been around SW for a good amount of time and yet, this **** thread keeps going and that surprises me - ehh, I dunno. :? I bet in six months we'll see even better visuals of Reach - wanna bet ? :P

mitu123

Oh wait, is this no, no, on GS - remember the bet threads ?

Lemme know and seriously, you think Bungie unzipped it's drawers already ? Wow. :P

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Tessellation"]lol at the fanboys posting bullshots of uncharted 2,the game is 2xMSAA and suddenly it went to 25xMSAA with those screenshots :lol:Brownesque

"Games like UC2 and Killzone 2 benifit from being based in corridors. Even Far Cry 2 is mainly based in small paths." I can see what you're trying to say about the first two games, but from my understanding isn't FC2 open world? I've never really understood the corridors comment anyway, it's not as if Halo is any different. I'm also being funneled from one area to another, usually through tunnels or doors. I mean, the game is hardly as expansive as say - Assassins Creed 2. Even then, it's not as if the first two games don't demonstrate large environments. Wait a minute, going back to Assassin's creed. Shouldn't the game be butt-ugly, having lots of AI, massive open world areas -- aren't these the reasoning behind Halo's lackluster presentation? inertk

Far Cry 2 is a sneaky little game. It draws you in and pretends to be open world, but have you seen the world map? Most of the paths have one thign in common, being inclosed by mountains. So it gives you the illusion that it's as open as say Crisis, but in reality it's just a more open corridor.

Also, Assassins Creed is a great game both technically and artisticly. Probably my graphics king, although there is far less going on then games like Killzone and Halo.

Looks Like Halo 3. :|

Stats_