@Daian Maybe that's true, but would it affect your enjoyment of the PC version? Nope. Also, there's no basis for your claim that a console version would be "pure crap". Just because a game is suited for mouse + keyboard doesn't mean it can't be adapted to controllers in a way that still works. If PC gamers had their way, no one else would ever be allowed to play a game on any other platform. Entitled brats.

@Volgin Because those IPs are owned by Microsoft and Sony. Last time I checked, Activision Blizzard doesn't own the PC platform.

PC elitists are the absolute worst types of gamers. Diablo III for PC is releasing tomorrow, would a console version be detrimental to your experience, in any way, shape or form? No, it wouldn't, so shut up.

@EE061003 And here, ladies and mentelgen, I present to you: the WORST POSSIBLE BREED OF GAMER.

@EE061003 And here, ladies and gentlemen, I present to you: the WORST POSSIBLE BREED OF GAMER.

GameSpot should try finding more industry analysts who aren't Pachter. I'm sure they exist, somewhere

@Gen-Gawl If Vanquish had a bigger dev team and more time, multiplayer would have benefited the overall package and it would have sold better. Its gameplay would have worked great for MP.

Everyone here is completely overreacting to his statements. To a certain extent, he's right; Vanquish's gameplay would have been well-suited to multiplayer and it would have been a lot of fun.

Also, some of you need to re-read the part of the article where he says "I'm not saying tack multiplayer onto every game."

@parrot_of_adun Sure, but maybe if you could only run it on lowest settings at an unstable framerate, then the 360 version might be more appealing. Maybe if all you have is a 5 year old netbook with no graphics card and 2 gb or less RAM.

@alpha_predator Some 360 owners can't run Minecraft on their ancient PCs, so I guess this is a good option for them.