[QUOTE="Wickerman777"]

Just read this article at Eurogamer...

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-can-xbox-one-multi-platform-games-compete-with-ps4

...and they speculated that PS4 actually has 20 CUs in it and Xbox One has 14 but in each console 2 are deactivated because of manufacturing yields concerns. Hmm, if that's true and considering how far behind Xbox One is in the GPU department they should just take the hit on yields and use all 14 of them. Won't happen, but would be nice.

ronvalencia

Consoles can't have multiple chip SKUs to cover for manufacturing defects.

Umm, what the hell does that mean? I never said there should be some Xbox Ones with 12 CUs and others with 14, lol.

[QUOTE="blackace"][QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"] when they showed Titanfall screenshots on the forums over here i really though they were x360 gameplay shots for a little while, but then it didnt make sense because im pretty sure they never showed off x360 titanfall gameplay?xboxiphoneps3

You guys are hilarious with these anti-Titanfall posts and threads. Were you at E3? Nope. But y'all like to pretend that somehow you know better than the people that were and whom heaped accolades and awards on it (How many awards did PS4 games win again, lol?). This is about it being a Xbox One title ... SOLELY. If and when it comes to PS4 y'all will change your tune instantly.

[QUOTE="blackace"]

[QUOTE="legalize82"] bbbbut the awardslegalize82

The PS4 games didn't get any awards.

You mad? You butthurt? Here I can help.

Dry your tears.

That's actually kinda funny considering that while 360 didn't have as many exclusives as PS3 it tended to get the ones that were huge blockbusters. Games like Gears and Halo, though few and far between, sold much better than most PS3 exclusives.

Umm, no. If that were the case what would be the point in upgrading from my X360? Heck, I'm pretty disappointed in the new consoles as it is: 1.8 tflops is well below what my expectations were (was expecting 2.5) and 1.2 tflops is ridiculous for a new console in late 2013.

Meh, who cares? MS does really well in only NA anyway.

It especially makes sense out of the very-similar-to-Xbox-One-GPU 7790 having 14 CUs in it.

Just read this article at Eurogamer...

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-can-xbox-one-multi-platform-games-compete-with-ps4

...and they speculated that PS4 actually has 20 CUs in it and Xbox One has 14 but in each console 2 are deactivated because of manufacturing yields concerns. Hmm, if that's true and considering how far behind Xbox One is in the GPU department they should just take the hit on yields and use all 14 of them. Won't happen, but would be nice.

[QUOTE="LordOfPoms"][QUOTE="xboxiphoneps3"] exactly, you can always reduce OS footprint but you cant take back RAM down the road, NFJSupreme

Xbone has DDR3 not GDDR3.  Two different things.  GDDR3 is based on DDR2 and DDR3 is what GDDR5 is based on.  But anyway the memory is not the real difference.  With its 32mb esram the memory of the xbone will perform close enough to the memory of the PS4 for it not to matter.  The real difference between the system and honestly the only substantial difference in terms of performance is the GPU in the PS4 being ~33% stronger.

This is basically true. However, it's the DDR3's fault that the GPU is weaker. The ESRAM and data move engines are there to help it out and those things use up space on the die that should have went to more compute units and ROPs.

I can't remember exactly what figure they gave nor even the exact company that said it, think it might have been Epic, but I recall reading an interview where someone said they had looked into what it would take to make a game that truly rivals reality and the figure they came up with was in petaflops and quite a few of them. Computers ain't nowhere near that right now.

Here's a PS4 sitting next to a PS3 (launch version). It ain't as big as you think it is.

http://kotaku.com/a-launch-playstation-4-versus-a-launch-playstation-3-927246513