@Sevenizz I actually liked the gaming more on the Xbox 1 than the 360. Mainly because I liked the games back then in general, and matchmaking wasn't such a priority back then. The days of searching for servers and joining the best one are behinds most of these games

@aloufika but you are only one person, there are plenty of others who do care about those. I for one actually want to see how much more they can push smart glass

@Uesugi-dono @Yomigaeru but now the question is, what is a true gamer?? if someone who spends countless hours on a mobile game any-less of a gamer than someone who spends countless hours on a gaming console?

You know, after talking to a bunch of people outside of the internet, I realize that people actually really like all the features MS has on the 360. I can't even blame them for having it. Plus, so many things are becoming multimedia devices. There were a time people complained about phones not being just phones anymore, this is just progression of technology and it is something people will have to accept

@everyday182 @dman123_1 @ploomp89 @ilovethewitcher you could, but there is no checkpoint putting a blu ray in, I don't have to go online for the blu-ray to be tested so i can play or watch on a console .. at least not yet anyway.

@everyday182 @grnsuperman4 the diff with PC though is that they don't need contracts to put it on the internet.

MS has to make deals to have those services on MS. It does cost, it also cost Sony and Nintendo as well. But I do agree, they need to restructure XBL, make online gaming free, but sweeten the pot for gold members, like gold only servers, built in clan features, skype group video chat, record and stream live gaming on the xbox, etc etc.

@Wolfkcing @demonkingx5 I would agree that you may save in the long run compared t consoles, but it depends how much you are into graphics, because if you are a graphic enthusiast, then you may spend X amount of dollars every few years. The way consoles are going, they want to extend the life of consoles for as long as they can, but if just want a graphics card that is capable of playing most games with at least mid level graphics, then you may save in the long run

@demonkingx5 no one (well me at least) isn't insulted, I don't even look at that as being a factor, plus, it is only superior if you meet the specs. like i said, part of the cost comes from them developing it on the particular consoles. I would assume it wouldn't be as much of a hassle to develop a game on a PC vs a console, but the console version will be optimized for all consoles and not just optimized on certain graphics cards

@grnsuperman4 @HipHopBeats @dman123_1 @demonkingx5 Exactly, PC's have overheated before, updates have caused pc's to become nothing more than a giant door stoppers (well with Vista updates anyway)

@grnsuperman4 @dman123_1 @demonkingx5 and that's why i said properly functioning. plus, you are picking a rare situation out of all the years console gaming has been around. PC's have always had the drawback that not every PC has the specs to run the latest games. That's people don't want to invest hooking up or shelling out 700 plus on a pre-made one