@jguilherme: Yeah, true, but geezers are a dying breed. And they don't go the theatres too often either.

@kaalkurayami: Is there an ending this shit? Or does it just keep going on and on, with no explanation in sight.

I will only watch this if there is definitive ending, .ie explanation on what happened, who the giants are, who created them and etc, etc.

If its one of those where they just keep making up crap to sell more manga's then no thanks.

I watched the first season, and honestly this looks like one of those shows where even the creator has no idea what the hell is happening. Looks like there is no definitive ending to this, and they are making it all up as they go along.

I'm gonna wait until the manga has all the answers to all the questions locked up before I invest anymore time on this one.

Good idea, but looks like nobody has any idea where its all going.

@zerofrust: Agreed, its a bad manga to adapt. Its very pseudo philosophical, and very Japanese centric with a lot of themes that harbor back to nuclear bombing of Japan and etc. None of these things gel very well with live action format by an American studio.

Probably why this film keeps getting canned. Its just not great for anything other than a cartoon.

Levitt is a good choice, he looks Asian for some odd reason.

Yeah for those asking for a Japanese actor, won't happen, film is too big for a Japanese actor to carry. Its gonna be Levitt or nothing.

@skemaal: Like I said saved by Hanks. Nobody liked the story much. Check imdb the consensus is nobody cares about the geezer spy.

Spielberg is very out of touch, with film going reality, nowadays.

A film about giant creepy looking geezers, really? Who would believe that kids would wanna watch this?

His last film "Bridge of Spies" was already extremely dated, and was literally saved by Tom Hank's charisma. The whole film I was wondering why I was supposed to care for the geezered out Russian spy. I literally couldn't less if the geezer died or not, it Tom Hanks alone that made the film watchable.

This dude needs to really stop making big budget films. If he insists on making films about geezers, at least make them with smaller budgets.

@novacav: What pisses me off is Reviewers collude with Nintendo to hide the fact that games have no 3D. Its annoying, when they purposely don't mention it in their reviews, as if 3D is not factor, when the system is designed to be used in 3D.

This the third game that had no 3D and Gamespot made no mention of it in its review.

Ever since Nintendo lifted the ban on No 3D games, more and more devs are getting lazy.

There is no reason for low graphics games like this and Sadame, and Binding of Isaac to have no 3D other than developer laziness.

If you look back at the earlier games of 3DS lifespan, all retail games had 3D, it was a mandate.

@jinzo9988: Forget Dragon Ball Z, think Dynasty Warriors. How many times can u play Romance of the Three Kingdoms over and over, we all know Cao Cao wins, so what's the point.. Same characters same story over and over and over.

The thing is people like the same thing over and over again. Its just human nature. We rather do the same thing that we know we like, then try something new.

Also this game has NO 3D.

Yes, there is no 3D on the 3DS version. So, making the 3DS version even more pointless.

There has been a lot of games on 3DS that have no 3D recently, 7th Dragon, Ninja Usagimaru, Sadame, Binding of Isaac, etc, etc. Seems like devs are getting lazier and lazier, since Nintendo loosened the regulations on 3DS games, more an more games are not 3d.

I wish reviewers will mention the fact that the games have NO 3D in their review, because its a huge factor for some of us who only play 3DS games in 3D.

Please include whether a game is 3D or not in your reviews. After all the system is called 3DS, its good to know if 3D is in the game as its a huge factor in purchasing for me.